BLACK FRIDAY: 20-60% OFF select products
Shop now

The State of Accessible Transport in the UK for 2027

9 minute read
Written by Manage At Home
women sat on bench next to rollator
Skip to section

Transport barriers continue to limit disabled people’s independence. ORR research published in 2026 found that one in ten surveyed passengers received none of the rail assistance they had booked. Meanwhile, RNID’s September 2026 report found that 41% of surveyed passengers who are deaf or have hearing loss said transport barriers limit their independence.

With a government-commissioned review of transport accessibility law underway in England and Wales, our research team at Manage At Home has conducted an analysis to assess the state of accessible transport in the UK for 2027.

Our report compares UK towns and cities across eight key measures that influence independent travel, including average station lift repair times, the reliability of pre-booked rail assistance, step-free station access, airport accessibility, Blue Badge airport parking and drop-off concessions, accessible hospitality venues, accessible toilets, and bus satisfaction among disabled passengers.

Our analysis identifies Edinburgh as the best UK city for disabled people travelling independently, followed by Bristol in second place and Derby third. Meanwhile, Birmingham and Bradford share last place as the least disabled-friendly cities for independent travel.

Key findings

  • Edinburgh ranks as the best UK city for disabled people travelling independently, scoring 7.3 out of 10 - the only city in our study to score above seven.
  • Birmingham and Bradford rank joint-last for independent travel accessibility, each scoring 3.1 out of 10
  • Edinburgh and Glasgow have the fastest average station lift repairs, at nine hours, compared with 23 hours in Derby, Nottingham, Leicester, Newcastle upon Tyne, Sunderland and Kingston upon Hull.
  • Newcastle upon Tyne records the most reliable pre-booked rail assistance, with passengers receiving all their booked support on 89% of journeys, compared with 76% in Birmingham and Wolverhampton.
  • Rotherham has the highest proportion of hospitality venues identified as accessible, at 54%, compared with just 3% in Kingston upon Hull.
  • Bristol has the most accessible toilets per resident, with 26 per 100,000 people, compared with just three in Leicester and Sunderland.
  • Derby records the highest bus satisfaction among disabled passengers, at 92%, compared with 73% in Bradford and Leeds.

The UK towns and cities best for disabled people travelling independently

Top 10 UK towns and cities for disabled transport and going out

RankCityLift repair time (hours)Rail assistance received (%)Step-free stations (%)Accessible hospitality venuesAccessible toilets (per 100,000)Disabled bus satisfaction (%)Overall score
1Edinburgh981%92%12%1784%7.3
2Bristol1784%93%9%2678%6.2
3Derby2383%100%5%492%6.2
4Nottingham2383%100%15%686%6.2
5Sheffield2183%100%40%1081%6.0
6Leicester2383%100%11%386%5.9
7Swansea1779%100%N/A686%5.4
8Newcastle upon Tyne2389%100%17%583%5.4
9Liverpool2184%77%11%684%5.4
10Glasgow981%64%11%1388%5.3

Edinburgh ranks first, scoring 7.3 out of 10 and finishing 1.1 points ahead of the next highest city. Lift repairs in Edinburgh take an average of nine hours, the joint-fastest time in the top 10. It also has 17 accessible toilets per 100,000 residents and offers Blue Badge holders one hour of free parking at Edinburgh Airport.

Bristol, Derby and Nottingham share second place on 6.2. Bristol has 26 accessible toilets per 100,000 people, the highest figure of any city analysed. Derby recorded the highest bus satisfaction among disabled passengers, at 92%, while Derby and Nottingham both have step-free access at every station analysed.

Sheffield ranks fifth with a score of 6.0. Alongside 100% step-free station access, 40% of its hospitality venues analysed were identified as accessible - the highest proportion in the top 10. Leicester follows in sixth place, also with step-free access at every station analysed, although it has just three accessible toilets per 100,000 residents.

Swansea, Newcastle and Liverpool share seventh place on 5.4. Newcastle recorded the top 10’s most reliable pre-booked rail assistance, with passengers receiving all the help they had booked on 89% of journeys. Glasgow completes the top 10: its regional lift repair time matches Edinburgh’s nine hours, but only 64% of its stations analysed offer step-free access.

Across the towns and cities shown in the tables, average station lift repair times range from nine hours in Edinburgh and Glasgow to 23 hours in Derby, Nottingham, Leicester, Newcastle upon Tyne, Sunderland and Kingston upon Hull - a difference of 14 hours.

The UK towns and cities worst for disabled people travelling independently

The 10 lowest-scoring UK towns and cities for disabled transport and going out

RankCityLift repair timeRail assistance receivedStep-free stationsAccessible hospitality venuesAccessible toilets per 100kDisabled bus satisfactionOverall score
1Bradford2178%93%19%473%3.1
2Birmingham2176%82%9%478%3.1
3Leeds2184%94%23%773%3.8
4Wolverhampton2176%100%31%578%4
5Barnsley2178%100%20%1281%4.1
6Sunderland2378%100%9%383%4.1
7Manchester2178%67%17%879%4.2
8Kingston upon Hull2383%100%3%591%4.3
9Coventry2180%100%32%778%4.5
10Rotherham2178%100%54%581%4.5

Birmingham and Bradford share last place for independent travel, each scoring 3.1 out of 10. Birmingham recorded the joint-lowest reliability for pre-booked rail assistance: passengers received all the help they had booked on 76% of journeys. Just 9% of its hospitality venues analysed were identified as accessible. Bradford performed better on step-free station access, at 93%, but recorded the joint-lowest bus satisfaction among disabled passengers, at 73%. Both cities have just four accessible toilets per 100,000 residents.

Leeds is the next lowest-scoring city, on 3.8. Although 94% of its stations analysed offer step-free access and pre-booked rail assistance was delivered in full on 84% of journeys, its disabled bus satisfaction score also stood at 73%. Wolverhampton follows on 4.0: every station analysed offers step-free access, but its 76% rail assistance reliability matches Birmingham’s joint-lowest result.

Sunderland and Barnsley share a score of 4.1 out of 10, despite every station analysed in both places offering step-free access. Sunderland has just three accessible toilets per 100,000 residents, compared with 12 in Barnsley, while passengers received all their pre-booked rail assistance on 78% of journeys in both cities.

Manchester follows on 4.2 out of 10. Just 67% of its stations analysed offer step-free access, the lowest proportion among the bottom 10, although its nearest airport received a ‘very good’ accessibility rating and offers free terminal drop-off.

Kingston upon Hull scores 4.3. Disabled passengers reported satisfaction with 91% of bus journeys, and every station analysed offers step-free access. However, just 3% of its hospitality venues analysed were identified as accessible - the lowest proportion in the study.

Rotherham and Coventry complete the bottom 10, sharing a score of 4.5. Both recorded step-free access at every station analysed. Rotherham had the highest proportion of accessible hospitality venues in the study, at 54%, while Coventry recorded 32%; passengers received all their pre-booked rail assistance on 78% and 80% of journeys respectively.

What needs to change to make independent travel more accessible?

Our Home Accessibility and Mobility Expert, Matt Ward, says the findings demonstrate why improving accessibility requires policymakers and transport providers to look at the whole journey rather than individual elements in isolation. Below, Matt outlines five steps that government and transport operators can take to improve independent accessibility:

1. Close the postcode lottery step-free access gap

“Our research found cities where 100% of the stations analysed provide step-free access, but there are still significant gaps elsewhere.

“Manchester sits at 67%, Liverpool at 77% and Birmingham at 82%. That means whether someone can make a journey independently can still depend significantly on where they live or where they are travelling to.

“Step-free access needs to become the expectation across the rail network rather than something passengers have to check before making every journey.

“The disparity can be even greater elsewhere in the rankings. London recorded step-free access at just 41% of the stations analysed, the lowest proportion within the study.”

2. Confirm and track every booked assistance request to boost service reliability

“Passengers should be able to see that their assistance booking has reached both their departure and arrival stations, with staff clearly assigned to help at each end. Train operators and stations could use a shared handover process, so a late train or platform change doesn’t leave the passenger waiting for help that never arrives.

“When assistance is missed, operators should record where the handover failed and review those cases regularly. Even the highest reliability figure in our study was 89%, so there is a clear need to learn from the journeys where passengers did not receive everything they booked.”

3. Help venues identify and remove access barriers

“Councils could start by working with local businesses to identify common barriers, such as steps at entrances, inaccessible toilets or furniture that blocks routes through a venue. Businesses can then prioritise practical changes, from rearranging seating and improving signage to installing a suitable ramp where one is safe and appropriate.

“Venues should also publish clear, current accessibility information, including entrance details and toilet facilities. That helps people decide whether they can visit before making the journey, while longer-term improvements are planned.”

4. Map toilet provision and make facilities easier to find

“Councils could map accessible toilets against transport hubs, high streets and visitor areas to identify where people face the longest gaps between suitable facilities. They can then prioritise those locations when upgrading public toilets or working with venues to make existing facilities available to visitors.

“It also matters whether a toilet can actually be used when someone needs it. Councils and venues should publish accurate information about opening hours, access requirements and facilities, and check regularly that toilets are open and in working order.

“Our analysis found as few as three accessible toilets per 100,000 people in some cities, compared with 26 in topscoring Bristol.”

5. Check accessibility from the start of a journey to its destination

“Transport providers and councils could review common journeys together, such as travelling from a station to a town centre, hospital or visitor attraction, including high-demand seasonal events such as firework displays and Christmas markets. This would help spot gaps between services - a step-free station may still lead to an inaccessible bus stop, a difficult crossing or a venue without a suitable entrance.

“Those routes should be made clear in information published, with agreements made on who is responsible for fixing each barrier. Looking at the journey from start to finish would help prevent one inaccessible stage from undoing improvements made elsewhere, boosting the opportunities for those with a disability to travel independently.”

Methodology

Our research compared 30 of the UK’s most populous towns and cities across key accessibility measures: station lift repair times, pre-booked rail assistance, step-free station access, airport accessibility, Blue Badge airport parking concessions, accessible hospitality venues, accessible public toilets and bus satisfaction among disabled passengers. These measures were combined to produce an overall score for each location.

Rail assistance figures came from the Office of Rail and Road’s 2025/26 Passenger Assist report, with each location matched to its main relevant train operator. Station lift repair times⁠ were assigned by region.

Airport accessibility used Civil Aviation Authority ratings⁠, with locations without an airport matched to the nearest by driving distance. Venue accessibility research used AccessAble⁠, while accessible public toilets were counted using the Great British Toilet Map⁠ and calculated per 100,000 residents.

Where local figures were unavailable, regional or operator-level data was used.

Additional reports and publications cited

This article is for informational purposes only.

Big savings on customer favourites
*Savings of 20% to 60% on select products

Shop now

Comments

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.